When a candidate is evaluated, feedback is gathered from Assembly members and compiled into a report. To help the Monarchy weigh that feedback fairly, each commenter's name is replaced with a label describing their relationship to the masterhood under discussion — so a Monarch can tell the difference between someone with direct authority in the area and someone who is simply persuasive.
I
Same Masterhood
A Master of the exact path under discussion. The closest thing to direct authority on the candidate's work.
II
Related Masterhood
A Master of a closely related path, bringing adjacent expertise to the discussion.
III
General Assembly Master
Any other Assembly member. Valuable perspective, without domain-specific authority.